FranzKafkaOverrated

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

not what you think but what you are

Posted on 19:58 by Unknown

I criticize the vague, toothless social liberalism that is shared by the large majority of those in the media not because I disagree with the sentiments, but because those commitments are absolutely empty, abandoned with the slightest pretense. Dividing social liberalism from economic reform has always been a boon to the ruling class, and an impediment to actual social justice, as nothing will improve the lives of the oppressed without structural economic change. But even beyond that, the typical commitment to these principles-- anti-racism, feminism, gay and transgender rights and acceptance, etc.-- tends to be paper thin. And even those whose commitments I don't question have a tendency to abandon them when it suits them. I love Alyssa Rosenberg and her work, but Louis CK could spit on Emmett Till's grave and she'd find some tangled explanation to excuse it. (Here's CK making with the comedy! You see, it's funny because it's a white guy repeatedly saying "nigger.")

So take Slate, and Daniel Engber, and the charming headline "Don't Bury Mike Shanahan at Wounded Knee." You see, this is hilarious, because there's a controversy surrounding the decision to play quarterback Robert Griffin III despite his knee injury, and he plays for a team called the Redskins, and hundreds of innocent Native Americans were brutally slaughtered in a racist massacre and thrown in a  mass grave. What profound whimsy! Nothing like brutal savagery meted out in the commission of state-sanctioned genocide to tickle the funny bone! I can't wait to see Slate's headlines riffing on Kristallnacht and the Middle Passage.

Of course, Engber and all of Slate's editors would insist that they care very much about the history of American Indian oppression and the horrors of Wounded Knee. And, hey, it's just a little joke, can't you take a harmless jest, on the serious level we care about this stuff.... What you have to have the courage to say-- despite the fact that they will do everything to undermine, dismiss, insult, and belittle you-- is that, no, in fact, people who make these kinds of jokes don't actually care about what happened at Wounded Knee, and don't actually care about the unspeakable atrocities that were inflicted on this country's native people. No one who is willing to look that legacy in the face could make such a casually cruel joke.

Look, I know exactly how this sort of thing goes over. If these things matter to you in an existential way, rather than as fashion, you'll be considered a bore, and a scold. It's inevitable. What you'll encounter in your life, if you hold onto these commitments not only when they are socially acceptable but when they aren't, is people who claim to agree on the principles while they simultaneously make a thousand excuses and insist on why this particular instance is the exception. Many people who are ostensibly concerned about this stuff live in those exceptions. And if you're interested in my advice, then it's simple: if you want to work to make the world better, don't live in the exceptions. Embody the principle. No matter how often they call you joyless, or pretentious, or holier-than-thou.

I get the accusations all the time. People ask me, Freddie, why are you so self-righteous. And I say, I'm not; it's only the contrast that makes you think I am. I just happen to really believe this stuff. I actually believe it, and so there's no room for exceptions. That's all.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    Just kill me now.
  • the very serious version
    OK. People seem to think that my little cartoon didn't take Ross Douthat's argument seriously enough. That's because I don'...
  • I need to tame this wild tongue if I'm to touch these white streets
    Having a blast of irrational optimism and a feeling, generally unknown to me, that this species might be able to get it together and organiz...
  • we must be ready to condemn this vicious knifing in the UK as terrorism
    Friends, now is not the time to quibble about definitions. It's not the time to worry about words and their meanings. Now is not the tim...
  • It would be easier to rebut stupid conspiracy theories if the government stopped doing conspiratorial shit
    You know, this Ibragim Todashev story is fucking crazy, and it's amazing that more people aren't pointing out that it's fucking...
  • we don't have a worker shortage
    Rick Santorum says we have a worker shortage when our unemployment rate is around 9% and the true joblessness rate likely several percentag...
  • it is rational to flee from torture
    As I write this, the media is working itself into a frenzy about Edward Snowden fleeing Hong Kong, possibly for Ecuador, and is passing thro...
  • the trouble with "progressive" (slight return)
    An emailer asks What's your beef with the term progressive? I prefer liberal myself, too, but I feel like that ship has sailed, and it i...
  • winning is fast, humanitarianism is slow
    Garance Franke-Ruta relays the most conventional of conventional wisdom: In the end, though, the only thing that is going to matter to the ...
  • "you see an old woman...."
    I quote this commenter not to pick on him particularly but because this bogus metaphor is so common: I see a frail old woman being assaulted...

Categories

  • I'm mostly kidding (1)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (218)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ▼  January (43)
      • couple of bros, chattin' about stuff
      • wat
      • actually, Matt Lewis is full of poop
      • the UBI and socializing finance
      • slippery things
      • stuffed up
      • ah, consistency
      • high school is nearly everybody
      • I need to tame this wild tongue if I'm to touch th...
      • stuff
      • norms of control
      • the quiet insistence of the real
      • a reason to care about those high definition screens
      • you probably don't have an opinion on poetry
      • oh savage hearts
      • I am at your disposal
      • MLK and Stonewall are the rejection of gradualism
      • and now it's time to pay these guys
      • I just fucked up in trying to prove that I didn't ...
      • narrative delusions
      • in trouble again
      • Alexis Madrigal is peddling bullshit once again (a...
      • some links and such
      • they seem to know where they are going, the ones w...
      • what are the rights of the disfavored?
      • "liberal interventionists" care about establishmen...
      • I hate to play to my image, but...
      • a handy guide to the use of "we"
      • due credit
      • singular "their" and the grammar wars
      • Reactionary Minds in antiquity
      • so strange
      • academics want their work to be available
      • against critical shorthand
      • house cleaning
      • In greatest travesty of the 21st century, a pretty...
      • more reporting, less generalism, more beats, less ...
      • not what you think but what you are
      • well this is odd
      • crappiness and its acceptance
      • Merry Christmas indeed
      • good luck to Sully, and to all
      • #thosesavageislams
  • ►  2012 (139)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2011 (143)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (27)
    • ►  March (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile