FranzKafkaOverrated

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 4 April 2011

failing students drop classes

Posted on 08:33 by Unknown
This is a small bore point, but important, I think. The endless debate about grade inflation is almost silent on the fact that part of grade inflation, and I'd wager a big part, is that students who are failing drop their courses, and those Ws don't affect their GPAs or the overall GPAs of the school, professor, or department in question. At most universities, students can withdraw from a class without it appearing on their transcript through the first couple weeks of classes, withdraw and have a W appear on their transcript within the first half or so of the course, and in some places, withdraw with a W with the permission of the instructor, chairperson, and dean. Typically, Ws don't factor into a student's GPA.

Now, perhaps you feel that the academy is too generous with how late it allows students to withdraw from courses, and you might make a compelling argument. But you're arguing something very different from arguing against grade inflation. While a W doesn't hurt a student's GPA, meanwhile, it means that the student hasn't earned those credits, and more than a few Ws is typically seen as very damaging for a grad school application.

If a professor has made his or her grading criteria clear, then students should have a pretty good handle on whether or not they are going to pass the class. It's very common for the worst performing students to drop rather than take the F. This artificially inflates GPAs, but doesn't reflect on lower standards for a professor, university, or the academy as a whole. Quite the opposite. To not discuss this facet of the issue is distorting and frankly irresponsible.

I know two things about grade inflation: one, it isn't mathematically significant when it comes to separating student performance. It's just not. The second thing I know is that everyone believes in grade inflation, but nobody believes that their own grades were inflated. That should tell you something.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    Just kill me now.
  • the very serious version
    OK. People seem to think that my little cartoon didn't take Ross Douthat's argument seriously enough. That's because I don'...
  • I need to tame this wild tongue if I'm to touch these white streets
    Having a blast of irrational optimism and a feeling, generally unknown to me, that this species might be able to get it together and organiz...
  • we must be ready to condemn this vicious knifing in the UK as terrorism
    Friends, now is not the time to quibble about definitions. It's not the time to worry about words and their meanings. Now is not the tim...
  • It would be easier to rebut stupid conspiracy theories if the government stopped doing conspiratorial shit
    You know, this Ibragim Todashev story is fucking crazy, and it's amazing that more people aren't pointing out that it's fucking...
  • we don't have a worker shortage
    Rick Santorum says we have a worker shortage when our unemployment rate is around 9% and the true joblessness rate likely several percentag...
  • it is rational to flee from torture
    As I write this, the media is working itself into a frenzy about Edward Snowden fleeing Hong Kong, possibly for Ecuador, and is passing thro...
  • the trouble with "progressive" (slight return)
    An emailer asks What's your beef with the term progressive? I prefer liberal myself, too, but I feel like that ship has sailed, and it i...
  • winning is fast, humanitarianism is slow
    Garance Franke-Ruta relays the most conventional of conventional wisdom: In the end, though, the only thing that is going to matter to the ...
  • "you see an old woman...."
    I quote this commenter not to pick on him particularly but because this bogus metaphor is so common: I see a frail old woman being assaulted...

Categories

  • I'm mostly kidding (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (218)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (43)
  • ►  2012 (139)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ▼  2011 (143)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ▼  April (27)
      • the sexual revolution happened for a reason
      • Portrait of My Father as a Young Man
      • keep radio silence
      • balloon juice post
      • illuminating!
      • few more things about college
      • wars are always founded on untruth
      • you're doing it wrong
      • Yglesias responds
      • reducing college costs
      • speak up, my man, and be accounted for
      • yet another casualty
      • once again: there can't be a higher education bubble
      • Katie Roiphe is just the worst
      • you can't defend something by constantly apologizi...
      • a bit more on Ulysses
      • their new scheme
      • correction
      • it only takes one reason
      • non-rhetorical questions and out of control abstra...
      • the real litmus test for Republican seriousness
      • seriousness and honesty are only conditionally vir...
      • all by yourself
      • straight fire
      • failing students drop classes
      • reason for optimism
      • today in unfortunate yet amazing errors, Freddie e...
    • ►  March (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile