FranzKafkaOverrated

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 26 August 2011

perhaps Andrew O'Hehir should say a little more about Colombia

Posted on 04:47 by Unknown
Andrew O'Hehir is, let's just say, not my favorite movie reviewer. That's no big deal. However, in a review of Colombiana, he responds to Colombians complaining that the film unfairly depicts Colombia by writing
One is that if your whole damn country hadn't been a failed state for 20 years or so, you might not have idiots from France like producer/co-writer Luc Besson and director Olivier Megaton -- yeah, that's a put-on last name -- using it as a cheap pretext for a trashy and ridiculous blend of "La Femme Nikita," "Scarface" and "Fast Five."
Har!

Of course, it's precisely the complaint of the Colombians who are protesting this movie that Colombia is a not a failed state, that surely the whole damn country is not, and that Colombian demonstrates that even educated Americans like O'Hehir don't know any better. He appears to be proving that point. I'm not qualified to make the case for Colombia as an improving nation, but the case is out there for you to evaluate.

But set aside potential improvements in Colombia's condition. Maybe we should consider why the country has been in such dire straights for so long. Perhaps there's some giant rapacious superpower due north that has explicitly proclaimed its ownership of the hemisphere for centuries that has been causing a little chaos. We could talk specifically about Plan Colombia, which has included funding and arming right wing paramilitary organizations, funneling in money that corrupts police departments and empowers cartels, sending military ordnance into a country that doesn't need any more weapons, and spraying thousands of defenseless people with aerial fumigation of unknown medical consequences and sometimes devastating economic consequences. Or we could go beyond just Plan Colombia and look at our general, decades-long history of manipulation in Colombia and the region, undertaken in large part to secure valuable resources and perpetuate a useless and inhumane drug war. Or we could just talk about the fact that this country can't stop doing cocaine but refuses to decriminalize it, and what that means for Colombia.

You know. If you're into that sort of thing.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    Just kill me now.
  • the very serious version
    OK. People seem to think that my little cartoon didn't take Ross Douthat's argument seriously enough. That's because I don'...
  • I need to tame this wild tongue if I'm to touch these white streets
    Having a blast of irrational optimism and a feeling, generally unknown to me, that this species might be able to get it together and organiz...
  • we must be ready to condemn this vicious knifing in the UK as terrorism
    Friends, now is not the time to quibble about definitions. It's not the time to worry about words and their meanings. Now is not the tim...
  • It would be easier to rebut stupid conspiracy theories if the government stopped doing conspiratorial shit
    You know, this Ibragim Todashev story is fucking crazy, and it's amazing that more people aren't pointing out that it's fucking...
  • we don't have a worker shortage
    Rick Santorum says we have a worker shortage when our unemployment rate is around 9% and the true joblessness rate likely several percentag...
  • it is rational to flee from torture
    As I write this, the media is working itself into a frenzy about Edward Snowden fleeing Hong Kong, possibly for Ecuador, and is passing thro...
  • the trouble with "progressive" (slight return)
    An emailer asks What's your beef with the term progressive? I prefer liberal myself, too, but I feel like that ship has sailed, and it i...
  • winning is fast, humanitarianism is slow
    Garance Franke-Ruta relays the most conventional of conventional wisdom: In the end, though, the only thing that is going to matter to the ...
  • "you see an old woman...."
    I quote this commenter not to pick on him particularly but because this bogus metaphor is so common: I see a frail old woman being assaulted...

Categories

  • I'm mostly kidding (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (218)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (43)
  • ►  2012 (139)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (26)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ▼  2011 (143)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ▼  August (23)
      • fuck everything right now
      • It occurs to me-- maybe some gaps are unbridgeable.
      • perhaps Andrew O'Hehir should say a little more ab...
      • a refreshingly honest take on neoliberal "consensus"
      • preconditions of respect
      • doin' it up right
      • stop digging, Zack
      • so which of Tina Brown's relatives is Zack Beauchamp?
      • nothing straight, but perfectly square
      • a reminder
      • a stomach punch of a sentence
      • Civil War tragedy, continued
      • the Civil War was exactly tragic, or not, depending
      • today in inevitability
      • from CAP, via MoveOn.Those are the numbers, folks....
      • missing the point on spoilers
      • quote for the day
      • revolution is the name you give the riots you like
      • ♫welcome back♪
      • defining the fundamental character of Israel
      • the contempt gap
      • do you really want what you say you want and are y...
      • first principles
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (27)
    • ►  March (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile